Machine prior to the science guidance.. Socialism did not lead to the abundance of production and to equality, and freedom, but led to a one-party system

Regardless of a few exceptions, it can be said: that socialism did not lead to the abundance of production, nor equality, nor freedom. But led to a one-party system, and dense bureaucracy, police and secret crooked, and heavy government control of the media, and keep the secret or secrets of governance, and the suppression of intellectual and artistic freedom.
Leaving aside the rivers of blood that was shed for the establishment of this system, and support and ensure stability, the quick look to him reveal that each of these elements, not just a way to organize the lives of individuals, but - and more deeply, it is a picture of the organization of knowledge, and codified , and control.
The function of a political system based on the one-party, is to monitor political contacts, and when there was no other party, it (the system) narrows the diversity of political media that trading in the community, and be a barrier to the retrovirus retroaetion impact , Muammaa those who occupy positions of power .. The complexity of the problems. Since then it becomes very difficult for the system to note errors or correct them as much as it ascends when the media - mirroring between its various components - from the bottom up, the only authorized means, and to the extent that descend commands, in the same ways.
The censorship, from top to bottom - applicable in the country of socialism, based on lies, distortion of Information, or prevent it. Because he was left-handed and dangerous things, the transfer of bad news, if we chose to judge according to the one-party system, it means in fact, that we take all decisions regarding knowledge. Moreover, the overwhelming bureaucracy set up by socialism in every episode of life. The way to narrow the knowledge.
This was the bureaucracy, Thbsaa in certain pockets in advance, and are closing in on communications, so Tqzaretha "formal" making it every touch, every media organization, something illegal.
The police secrecy, and set by the state on the media, and terrorism thinkers, and the suppression of freedoms of art, was one of some many attempts to curb media, and censoring it is based on each and every one of these items to placed a single decomposed and beyond - on knowledge. They placed suggest arrogant opinion, who believes that those who have power - the right to know what others should know.
These characteristics were shared between all the socialist countries, arising from the concept of the machine's previous guidance, as was applied to society, and to live together, and they ensure that, in the economy, Gbaoua visible. The second wave machines, just like those that were part of the world of Marx in the nineteenth century - the work, for the most part without any retroactive effect. As if workers said: Hrkoha; ignite the engine, and start, then, its work without any account of what is happening in the outer perimeter.
In contrast, the third wave machines, smart. They are equipped Bloaqt media objects from the ocean, and notes the changes taking place, and they correspond with the result. It is self-regulating.Thus, the difference between it and its predecessors, a revolutionary difference ..
Marxists and theorists, just as revealing that vocabulary, remain DEFAULTERS. Past the second wave, Gaúchin. Thus, the class struggle was represented for the Socialists Marxists "locomotive of history." Was one of the fundamental tasks have to put their hand on the "state machine", and even the community itself, like a machine completely, can Tt to overflowing prosperous and freedom to the people.When he took Lenin in 1917, the reins of power has become mechanical top. And he understood, as an educator Metallic, the importance of ideas, but it was calculated that the symbolic production - the same mind - he is also scheduled. There where Marx was talking about freedom, was Aneben, after seizing power, holds himself responsible for knowledge. Thus, it insisted always be art, culture, science, journalism, and any other activity, in the service of holistic strategy, while intended, were branches of education different, pending regulation, in certain departments, grant degrees bureaucracy specific, subject to this and others to the authority of the party and the state. Then used "intellectuals workers" in the institutions monitored, and controlled by the Ministry of Culture. As well as the publishing and radio and the like, be under the supervision of the state, just as knowledge itself become a Dolaba Rims state.
This approach imperfect knowledge, and conflicting conflict with the fundamental principles of every economic progress in the era of "information science" is that prevented all made ​​in factories with the falling level.

إرسال تعليق

أحدث أقدم

نموذج الاتصال