Compose the current deployment of the system of wealth creation, in the era of the third wave, a challenge to the socialist creed columns. Take, for example, the subject property.
And a long time ago, it was the Socialists accuse the private ownership of the means of production, as the cause of oppression, asthenia, unemployment, and other misfortunes-industrial. But all these issues resolved is: Re factories to the workers, whether by the state, or by the collective factories.
When has this stage or when you are, things changed: What dissipation resulting from overcrowding, in addition to the very rational planning, and production directed for the benefit of the people, Not for profit for some people, and employing intelligent, his mission to work on the progress of the economy. Wholesale, the dream of prosperity, for the first time in history, will be achieved for all ..
In the nineteenth century, these ideas seem to reflect the most advanced scientific knowledge.Indeed, the Marxists they claim that they went beyond the utopian ideals. They had arrived at the "scientific socialism" real. And was able to utopian dream of the establishment of independent groups internally. The Socialists Scientists know that such perceptions, in an industrial society, in the process of growth, will not be applicable. While some utopians such as Charles Forbah, turning to the agricultural past, the scientific socialists, they pay attention to what was then called as industrial future.
Thus, what came of socialist systems, then, to try cooperatives, labor and management, and nationalization, and other similar solutions, internationalization (or nationalization The dominant form of ownership, in the whole communist world. Where was the state - not workers - are becoming the first beneficiary of the socialist revolution.
Thus, socialism has not been achieved her to fulfill its promises, that is, they did not achieve better conditions of life, drastically, to the people, and when dropped the quality of life in the Soviet Union, after the revolution, attributed not without some truth, to the effects of the First World War, and the effects of counter-revolution . Then, make the siege capitalist responsible for the deficit picture. Then and then the Second World War is the biggest offender responsible for this. But was not essential goods, such as coffee and orange also deficient in Moscow, after thirty years?
And strangely, although the Socialists Orthodox were Atnaqson number, they continued to believe in the need to nationalize the industry, and finance. In Brazil, Peru, South Africa, and even in Western countries manufacturer, is still there things no hesitation in, not a condition on them, despite the evidence inverse given by history, there was still between socialists of the opinion that "public administration" of the country and (any Nationalization) progressive thing, and refuses to reverse nationalization and customize the economy.
It is true that the global economy, the increasing liberalization, more and more, and Almchadba, blindly by multinational corporations, remains a concern. It is also unfortunate that the liberalization is no longer okay for the poor, always, however, depending upon the model known: point فنقطة. And with that, we have a large number of certificates that unquestionable that companies internationalized detrimental to workers, and air pollution, and hurt or offend dealing with the general public, as far as do private companies, at least. And many of them became demons in Allanga, corruption and greed. And often encourages a large black market, undermine the legitimacy of the state.
Ironically, that nationalized companies, rather than to be the vanguard of technical progress, as promised, has become all, without exception, reactionary - but say companies are the most bureaucratic, and slowest in the reorganization. And least prepared to accommodate the changing needs of customers, and most panic of media in the spread of citizens, and the last to adopt new technologies.
During more than a century, socialists and supporters of capitalism Etjabhon violently around the problem of private property and public property. Hundreds of men and women يهبون their lives for such a battle. But unless imagined those and them, is that the new system for creating wealth makes their arguments are almost void.
However, this is what happened. The most important form of ownership, is one that does not find an impact in your hands It is a high road. The so-called "knowledge. Then that same knowledge can be used by many people, to create wealth and increase the production of knowledge. Unlike factories and fields, the knowledge does not accept depletion.
التسميات
third wave