The interactive theory is, do not provide a comprehensive understanding of the personal, the holders of the theory and led Bloomer admit that this theory should not concern itself with the subject of personal as busy psychology. This apparent reason, and substantial justification for the lack of benefit of this theory in the field of education, despite the presence of a few research published here and there.
The interactive Avatar overlooked the broad aspects of the social structure; Therefore we find can not say anything about social Kalqoh phenomena, conflict and change, and that the theoretical formulation dumped in mystery, and it provides an incomplete picture of the individual. With regard to the theory of social in sociology, it can be said that they area currently prevailing in the sociology of education, has been singled out as: (Educational Sociology new); because it combined style careful research, using the method of observation, and participant observation in the classroom, and the method of broad social research, which included wide Kalgahr issues, conflict, and change, and social mobility, and the role of education in it.
Perhaps the study carried out by Neil KDE Nell Keddie. In an English school, titled: \ "knowledge of the classroom \" one of the few studies conducted in the framework of this interest with the knowledge that no teachers have about their students, a model for the concerns of the new sociology of education.
التسميات
Theories